Santokh Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as having become infructuous.
Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11226 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 25.03.2011
Santokh Singh
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..........Respondents
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. PPS Duggal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present
petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
March 25, 2011 pooja
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No
Santokh Singh
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court