Infructuous bail application dismissed by this Court after the Sessions Judge allowed bail to the petitioners, rendering the current plea redundant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-11223 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 26.05.2011
Satnam Singh and others
...Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravish Kaushik, AAG, Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been allowed the concession of bail by the Sessions Judge and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
MAY 26, 2011 shalini
(K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Satnam Singh and others
State of Haryana
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
