Petitioner was declared infructuous as he, along with other accused, had been acquitted by the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-10323 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 26.05.2011
Mukesh
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravish Kaushik, AAG, Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Madan Lal, has submitted that the petitioner along with other accused
has been acquitted by the trial Court and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
MAY 26, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Mukesh
State of Haryana
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
