Rajesh Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No. 11189 of 2010 (O&M)
Vinay Yadav
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Ms. Pooja Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sunil Panwar and Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocates for the complainant.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in Criminal Misc.-M No. 9391 of 2010, titled as Rohtas Singh
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinay Yadav
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/11189/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court