Single judge made anticipatory bail petition absolute granting relief to petitioners who joined investigation, subject to Section 438(2) conditions.
Order dated April 08, 2011 made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-10820 of 2011 Date of decision : 19.05.2011
Majidan and another
....Petitioners
V/s
State of Haryana
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered against the petitioners vide FIR No. 619 dated 17.12.2010 under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Nuh, District Mewat.
Learned counsel for the State (on instructions from ASI Sarup Singh, who is present in court) submits that pursuant to order dated April 08, 2011, the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no longer required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the above, order dated April 08, 2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Disposed of.
May 19, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail petition should be made absolute given the petitioner's cooperation in investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Majidan
another
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
