Petitioner sought anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc. No. M-10499 of 2011. Counsel requested withdrawal with liberty to approach Trial Court under Section 438(6). Petition dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move proper application before Trial Court under Section 438(6) CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-10499 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: April 18, 2011
Vikramjit Singh
….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
… Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present: Mr. S.S. Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Alok Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that trial is pending before the Magistrate and trial has not been concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for evidence, therefore, petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail under Section 438 (6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to
2
Crl. Misc. No.M-10499 of 2011
move a proper application before the Trial Court under Section 438(6) of the Code.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
April 18, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikramjit Singh
State of Punjab
Allok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
