Petitioner sought dismissal of a civil revision with reference to Supreme Court precedent; court ordered dismissal with liberty to approach Appellate Authority.
Petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before Appellate Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.7025 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.11.2011
Kapil Dev
-----Petitioner
Vs.
Gurdial Singh
-----Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner stated that this petition be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the Appellate Authority in terms of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup Bansal, JT 2011(6) SC 236.
Ordered accordingly.
November 16, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup BansalReferred¶14
Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup Bansal, JT 2011(6) SC 236 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kapil Dev
Gurdial Singh
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
