Petitioner challenged an order allowing a stay application. Court dismissed the writ petition on 14.2.2011 as infructuous because the matter was settled/compromised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.6556 of 2009
Date of Order: 14.2.2011
Balwinder Singh
.....Petitioner
Vs.
Baljit Kaur
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for the petitioner.
JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL)
By filing the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for setting aside the impugned order dated 3.10.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur whereby an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC of the respondents-plaintiffs has been allowed.
On 19.11.2010, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had stated that the matter had been settled and time was sought to place on record the requisite compromise.
At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that though written compromise could not be placed on record but he agrees that the matter has been compromised.
In view of the fact that the matter has been compromised, present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
February 14, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE
Balwinder Singh
Baljit Kaur
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
