The singleженная order dismissed the civil revision petition with an observation for the Rent Controller, Hisar, to decide the underlying matter expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.6208 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:04.11.2011
Vimla Chaudhary
....Petitioner
Versus
Trilok Saini and another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this
petition is dismissed with the observations that the Rent Controller, Hisar, shall decided the petition, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
November 04, 2011 savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
Vimla Chaudhary
Trilok Saini
Another
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
