Baldev Singh v. Gurtej Kaur and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was compromised, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was compromised, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 6180 of 2009 Date of decision: 12.07.2011
Baldev Singh
........ Petitioner
Versus
Gurtej Kaur and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. M S Uppal, Advocate for the petitioner
None for the respondents
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised and the present petition is rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
12.07.2011
mohan
Baldev Singh
Gurtej Kaur
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court