Dismissed
Sunita v. Meena and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/3817/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.3817 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 01.12.2011
Smt. Sunita
....Petitioner
Vs.
Smt. Meena and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present:Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL)
This petition assails the order dated 24.05.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ganaur, allowing the application filed by defendant-respondent No.1 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and directing the plaintiff-petitioner to file ad valorem Court fee.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
(A.N.JINDAL) December 01, 2011 JUDGE ajp
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sunita
Smt. Meena
another
A.N. JINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court