Thin order dismissing civil revision regarding impleadment. No substantive ratio provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No. 1923 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 25.03.2011
Vinod Kumar and others
....Petitioners
Vs.
Fateh Chand and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present:Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL)
This petition assails the order dated 15.01.2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for impleading them as party, was dismissed.
No grounds to interfere.
Dismissed.
However, the petitioners are relegated to the remedy
as provided under law.
(A.N.JINDAL) 25th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp
Vinod Kumar and others
Fateh Chand and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
