Surinder Singh v. State of Haryana and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petitioner challenged an order closing evidence due to non-appearance. High Court set aside the impugned order and granted petitioner one further opportunity to conclude evidence while impleading him with costs for his fault.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 2.11.2010 set aside; petitioner granted one opportunity to conclude evidence; costs of Rs.5,000 awarded.