Petition in Arbitration Case No. 229 of 2006 was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the court's communication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 04.08.2011
Arb. Case No.229 of 2006
M/s Airwings Services Pvt. Ltd. and another
…Petitioners
Versus
M/s ATW India and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Present: Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners
have not responded to his communication.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
04.08.2011 Vimal
M/s Airwings Services Pvt. Ltd. and another
M/s ATW India and another
Hemant Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
