State of Haryana v. Shankar etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order references a separate detailed judgment regarding R.F.A. No. 2492 of 1992 concerning the estate of Moharli alias Mohari (deceased), indicating the current file is devoid of substantive reasons.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 3858 of 1992 (O&M) and Cross Objections No.30-CI of 2002 (O&M)
State of Haryana
....... Appellant
Versus
Shanker and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for the cross objectors.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 2492 of 1992, titled Moharli alias Mohari
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana
- respondent
Shanker
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/3858/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court