The appellant's appeal was disposed of by reference to a separate order of the same date in RFA No. 375 of 2002 regarding Baljit Kaur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
RFA No. 376 of 2002 (O&M)
Kuldip Singh ..... Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh ..... Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: None for the parties.
Rajesh Bindal J.
For the detailed reasons recorded in RFA No. 375 of 2002 – Baljit Kaur vs Union Territory, Chandigarh , vide a separate order of even date, the present appeal is disposed of.
15.10.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Baljit Kaur vs Union Territory, ChandigarhReferred¶7
Baljit Kaur vs Union Territory, Chandigarh
Kuldip Singh
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajesh Bindal
Parties & counsel
