The appellant filed this appeal. The High Court dismissed the appeal referencing detailed reasons in a related order of the same date passed in R.F.A. No. 2804 of 2008.
The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. 3142 of 2009 (O&M)
Balhar Singh
....... Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh
...... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for the respondent
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a
separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 2804 of 2008 – Joginder Singh Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh, the present appeal is dismissed.
10.03.2010 (RAJESH BINDAL) sarita JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Joginder Singh Versus Union Territory, ChandigarhReferred¶13
R.F.A. No. 2804 of 2008 – Joginder Singh Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh
Balhar Singh
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
