This appeal was disposed of by relying on the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date in RFA No. 68 of 1992, holding the present appeal should be decided in identical terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 1566 of 2002 (O&M)
Smt. Gurmej Kaur
....... Appellant
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: None for the land owner.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 68 of 1992– Smt. Sunanda Kapur Versus State of Haryana and another the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
20.04.2010 (RAJESH BINDAL) sarita JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Sunanda Kapur Versus State of Haryana and anotherFollowed¶12
R.F.A. No. 68 of 1992– Smt. Sunanda Kapur Versus State of Haryana and another
Smt. Gurmej Kaur
The State of Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
