The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal against the affirmation of a Single Judge's order dismissing the appellant's writ petition challenging his dismissal from the Transport Department for misconduct involving fare evasion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LPA No. 626 of 2010
1
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.
LPA No. 626 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2010
Gurmail Singh
....Appellant.
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents.
Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh
1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ?
Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate for the appellant.
Alok Singh, J.
LPA No. 626 of 2010
2
– petitioner by filing appeal, revision and review, but the same were dismissed. Ultimately, the petitioner challenged the order dated 30.9.2005 dismissing him from service by filing writ petition before learned Single Judge, which was also dismissed. Hence, the present appeal.
( Alok Singh ) Judge
( Adarsh Kumar Goel ) Judge
14.05.2010 sk.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court could interfere with the dismissal order following a departmental enquiry where charges were proved.
Whether the punishment awarded for charging fare without issuing tickets was severe than the charges levied.
Gurmail Singh
State of Punjab
Alok Singh
Adarsh Kumar Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
