Dismissed
Rameshwar Dayal & Anr. v. Ayub & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/1034/1988
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
F.A.O. No. 1034 of 1988 (O&M)
Rameshwar Dayal and another
....Appellants
Versus
Ayub and others
....Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. J.L. Malhotra, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the Insurance Company.
RAJESH BINDAL J
For the detailed reasons recorded in FAO No. 1032 of 1988,
Santosh Kumari Vs. Ayub and others, vide separate order passed today, the present appeal is disposed of in same terms.
17.3.2010.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
Rameshwar Dayal
another
Ayub
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court