The High Court dismissed a writ appeal challenging an order rejecting an application for a liquor permit. The court held that the officer's subjective satisfaction, based on the applicant's husband being a habitual excise offender, justifiably refused the permit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 8959 of 2010
1
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.
CWP No. 8959 of 2010 and CWP No.9073 of 2010
Date of Decision: 17.05.2010
...Petititioner
Versus State of Haryana and others
...Respondents.
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents.
Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh
Present: Mr. R.N. Lohan Advocate for the petitioner.
Alok Singh, J.
CWP No. 8959 of 2010
2
[as applicable to Haryana] (hereinafter referred to as the 1932 Rules).
case.
17.05.2010 sk.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the application for liquor permit due to the habitual offender status of the applicant's husband is合法 under the 1932 Rules.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Birmati
State of Haryana
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
