Held prayed for Hyderabad same disposed of this petition directed respondents to consider the petitioner's claim regarding non-selection and dispose of it via a speaking order within four months.
Directed respondents to consider petitioner's claim of non-selection and dispose of the matter by speaking order within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.5112 of 2012 Date of Decision: March 20, 2012
Davinder Singh
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
which applications were invited by the respondent Corporation. Petitioner's grievance is that final selection list was displayed on 20.11.2011 (Annexure P-8), however, he has not been selected though as per the academic qualification relied upon by him, he ought to have been there in the selection list. The above stated claim has been raised by the petitioner by legal notice dated 25.11.2011
CWP No.5112 of 2012 [2]
(Annexure P-9) also.
(Surya Kant) March 20, 2012 Judge avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who was not selected for the post of Lineman despite claiming eligibility, should be considered and a speaking order passed within four months.
Davinder Singh
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
