In this Civil Writ Petition challenging the selection process for Civil Judge (Junior Division) and the disqualification of the petitioner, the single judge held that no ground for extraordinary writ jurisdiction was made out and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.20324 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 16, 2010
Krishan
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
CWP No. 20324 of 2010 [2]
respondents in fixing qualifying condition of 50% marks in the main examination for the candidates belonging to the ex-servicemen category.
CWP No. 20324 of 2010 [3]
been filed only because the petitioner could not get sufficient marks in preliminary examination and has not been given the chance to take the main examination.
November 16, 2010 JUDGE
aj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise writ jurisdiction to interfere with the selection process for Civil Judge (Junior Division) post.
Whether the qualifying conditions for the main examination, including the 50% merit requirement and English-only viva voce, can be quashed.
Krishan
State of Haryana and others
Ajai Lamba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
