Present petition allowed; impugned order quashed; liberty granted to respondents to hold fresh enquiry and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
Impugned order is quashed; liberty granted for fresh enquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 17002 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 08.12.2010
Chaman Lal, Sarpanch
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present : Ms. Jatinder Jit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl. A.G. Punjab
Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 5
ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondent-State and respondent No. 5 fairly stated that impugned order be quashed with liberty to the respondent-State to hold fresh enquiry and to pass order in accordance with law.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, present petition is allowed. Impugned order is quashed. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to hold fresh enquiry and to pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
(ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
08.12.2010 reena
Chaman Lal
State of Punjab
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
