Petitioner sought writ regarding final selection. Court dismissed petition as premature, noting petitioner was called to check original documents and was registered as a candidate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15190 of 2010
Date of Decision: 25.08.2010
Baljinder Kaur
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M. KUMAR, J.
The writ petition is wholly pre-mature as the petitioner has already been called by letter dated 18.8.2010 (P-9), to check her original documents, as she is one of the candidates registered.
Dismissed as pre-mature.
(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE
August 25, 2010
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
Pkapoor
Baljinder Kaur
State of Punjab
M. M. Kumar
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
