In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Single Judge dismissed the petitioner's claim for regular promotion to Head Constable from 6.8.1989, holding that seniority rules applied and the petitioner was junior to those promoted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.15152 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 25, 2010
Ajmer Singh
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
CWP No.15152 of 2010 [2]
on adhoc basis earlier to the other persons, the petitioner has a better right to promotion.
petition, the same is dismissed.
August 25, 2010 JUDGE avin
CWP No.15152 of 2010 [3]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner entitled to adhoc promotion can claim regular promotion when junior to others under seniority rules.
Whether the petitioner has a right to regular promotion before senior Constables given the adhoc nature of the prior appointment.
Ajmer Singh
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
