Petitioners requested withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one after placing detailed information on record.
Withdrawal of CWP No. 13787 of 2010 allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition after placing detailed information on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 13787 of 2010
Date of Decision: August 5, 2010
Naresh Kumari and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: Dr. Suresh Kumar Redhu, Advocate, for the petitioners.
M.M. KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one after placing on record all the detailed information.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforementioned.
(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE
August 5, 2010
(A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE
Pkapoor
Naresh Kumari and another
State of Haryana and others
M.M. Kumar
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
