O&M dismissed because Bank and relevant department were not impleaded; petitioner granted liberty to file a better petition.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a better petition on impleading necessary and relevant parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.13743 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2010
Usha Rani
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Another
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Y.M. Bhagirath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
The matter was adjourned because necessary party i.e. Bank was not impleaded. It has come to the notice at this stage that even relevant department has also not been impleaded as party.
The petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file a better petition while impleading necessary and relevant parties.
(AJAI LAMBA)
August 12, 2010 JUDGE avin
Usha Rani
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
