Hilal Ahmad Bhatt v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge orally disposed of Crl. Misc. No. M-12453 of 2010 as infructuous because the petitioner had been convicted.
Single judge orally disposed of Crl. Misc. No. M-12453 of 2010 as infructuous because the petitioner had been convicted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-12453 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: August 11, 2010
Hilal Ahmad
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
Present: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel contends that because the petitioner has been
convicted, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as infructuous.
11.08.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE
Hilal Ahmad
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court