A writ petition seeking seniority fixation for retired employees was dismissed as infructuous by a single judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court based on respondent counsel admissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.W.P. No. 11647 of 1989
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.11647 of 1989
Date of Decision: April 20, 2010
Dr. Harnam Singh --- Petitioner
Versus
Panjab University, Chandigarh and another --- Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. .B L. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
, .J
In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of
2
C.W.P. No. 11647 of 1989
of Readers, Department of Physical Education, Panjab
University, may be fixed above respondent No.2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents
rendered infructuous. It will, however, be open to the
petitioner to seek revival of the writ petition if any of the
above facts is found to be not true.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) April 20, 2010 JUDGE
RKMALIK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for fixing seniority of retired employees is maintainable given their retirement status.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Harnam Singh
Panjab University, Chandigarh
Respondent No.2
Ajay Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
