Sunita Kumari & Anr. v. Hr. Staff Selection Comm.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Misc.No.13442 of 2010 & Civil Writ Petition No.11513 of 2010
Sunita Kumari & another Vs. The Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula
Present: Mr.Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate, for Mr.S.N.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The hearing of the writ petition is preponed to today. The only prayer made in the writ petition is for issuance of roll number. Now an application has been filed to say that the result be also declared. Accordingly, it would mean that the petitioner was issued roll number and has appeared in the examination. The main relief sought in the writ petition, thus, stands granted. The prayer for declaration of result, which is beyond the pleadings, cannot, thus, be considered in this case.
The writ petition is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
September 27, 2010 ramesh
( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
Sunita Kumari
The Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court