Anju v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 10922 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.09.2010
Anju
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
Present: Mr. Kamal Satija, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State.
Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate and Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.
RANJIT SINGH J.
Mr. Bal has placed before me a letter showing that the authorities have decided to conduct the special examination of the petitioner on 25.10.2010 at the Board's Headquarter and intimation in this regard has been sent to the petitioner. Let the copy of this communication be also supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. The communication dated 21.09.2010 referred to above is kept on record at mark 'A'.
The writ petition, therefore, is rendered infructuous and is
disposed of as such.
September 27, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE
Anju
State of Haryana
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court