Sandeep Kaur v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 11465 of 2010
Sandeep Kaur
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State.
Mr. P.K. Chug, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Counsel for respondents points out that the petitioner has already been granted admission by imposing some conditions. The prayer made in the writ petition, accordingly, is rendered infructuous. If the petitioner is still left with any grievance, she would be at liberty to approach the Court again.
August 24 , 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE
Sandeep Kaur
State of Haryana
RANJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court