Ashok Kumar v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. W.P. No. 2250 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : 30.11.2010
Ashok Kumar
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and another
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH
Present: Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
The petitioner, who is a life convict and is undergoing sentence in Central Jail, Ambala, has filed this petition for issuing direction to the respondents to grant him house repair parole for four weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has not completed one year of imprisonment after his conviction, which is required under Rule 4 (1) of the Hayana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007 for considering the request of a convict for the grant of parole, therefore, he does not want to press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
November 30, 2010 ( JORA SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Ashok Kumar
State of Haryana
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
JORA SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court