Petitioner sought withdrawal of his criminal miscellaneous petition. High Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach appropriate authority, dismissing the petition.
Liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-5409 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: May 17, 2010
Darshan Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
The SSP, Rural, Amritsar, and others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr. BS Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1.
GURDEV SINGH, J.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the affidavit of the petitioner and the same has been taken on record.
In view of the reply submitted by respondent No.1, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he does not want to proceed with the present petition and he be allowed to withdraw the same with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority.
Allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn with above said liberty.
May 17, 2010 prem
(GURDEV SINGH ) JUDGE
Darshan Singh
The SSP, Rural, Amritsar
Gurdev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
