Petitioner withdrew a criminal miscellaneous petition after it was declared infructuous due to a concurrent order passed on the same day in a related matter.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 35741 of 2009 Date of Decision : December 21, 2010
Baljinder Singh
........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
........Respondent
Present : Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S. Grewal, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate, for the complainant.
S.S. SARON, J.
Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of
the order passed today in CRM-M- No.37553 of 2010 the present petition
has been rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
December 21, 2010 Anand
(S.S. SARON) JUDGE
Baljinder Singh
State of Punjab
S.S. Saron
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
