The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent and did not place a relevant authority to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-34156 of 2010 Date of decision : 08.12.2010
Hemant
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Haryana
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Ms. Shalini Atri, DAG Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Case has been called out twice since morning. No one has put
in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is no
longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
December 08, 2010 Ajay
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
Hemant
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
