Inderjit Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The court confirmed an earlier order granting interim anticipatory bail to four petitioners. It observed that they had joined the investigation and no further custodial interrogation was required by the State, with no allegations of absconding or witness dissuasion.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 27.11.2009 granting interim bail to petitioners 1, 2, 4, and 5 was confirmed subject to compliance of conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
-1-
Crl.M.No.M 33538 of 2009 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M 33538 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2010
Inderjit Singh and others
.....Petitioners
v.
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Rajeev Godara, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail granted by a coordinate bench should be confirmed.
Whether the conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. have been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Inderjit Singh and others
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
RAM CHAND GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/33538/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court