Bimla and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the application. The Court held that since recovery of claimed jewellery articles was not effected, no ground for bail was made out, and the petitioners were required for custodial interrogation.
What did the court decide?
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed; no interim bail granted as custodial interrogation was deemed necessary.