The High Court allowed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking pre-arrest bail in an IPC case. The court held that since the petitioner had joined the investigation, the earlier order dated 03.11.2009 was made absolute.
The petition was allowed and the Order dated 03.11.2009 was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-30410 of 2009
Date of Decision: 18.03.2010
Paramjit Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Satish Jaswal, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Gurna, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State.
Ms. Dalbir Kaur, Advocate for the complainant.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking pre-arrest bail in case FIR No.165 dated 27.08.2009 under Sections 406/498-A IPC registered at Police Station Payal, Police Distt. Khanna, District Ludhiana.
Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from Head Constable Sham Lal, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.
Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order dated 03.11.2009 passed by this Court is, hereby, made absolute.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) Judge
18.03.2010 gurpreet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for pre-arrest bail should be allowed given that the petitioner has joined the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Paramjit Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
