The petitioner withdrew the Criminal Revision maintains petition filed under Section 397 of CrPC, 1973. The High Court dismissed the petition by consent without recording any substantive findings on law or facts.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 21166 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.10.2010
Munish Sehajpal
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. L M Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State
None for the complainant
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
October 12, 2010 mohan
Munish Sehajpal
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
