In an petition under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail in an IPC 420/120-B case, the Court made the previous bail order absolute after the State counsel informed that the petitioner had joined the investigation.
The order dated 14.07.2010 in this matter is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 19721 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.10.2010
Labh Singh
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Surender Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner
Mrs Ravinder Kaur Nihalsinghwala, Addl. A.G. Punjab for the respondent
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 19 dated 29.06.2010, under Sections 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Balongi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI-Kuldeep Chand, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.
In view of the above, the order dated 14.07.010 passed by this Court is made absolute.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
12.10.2010 mohan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted order should be made absolute upon the petitioner joining investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Labh Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
