The petitioner sought quashing of a complaint but submitted the petition as withdrawn following a compromise with the complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. 20436 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: May 20, 2010
Prodip Kumar Dutta
...Petitioner
Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate, for Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1.
Mr. TN Sarup, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
GURDEV SINGH, J.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the compromise already entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.2, name of the petitioner has been dropped from the complaint, for the quashing of which the present petition was filed, and the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
Allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 20, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE
PRODIP KUMAR DUTTA
STATE OF PUNJAB
GURDEV SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
