The High Court dismissed a petition when the appellant's counsel withdrew it to pursue an alternative process and seek condonation of delay before the Court of Sessions Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 1004-MA of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.10.2010
D.V.S. Verma
...Appellant
versus
Ram Avtar
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the appellant.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the appellant to avail his appropriate remedy before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
October 14, 2010 naresh.k
D.V.S. Verma
Ram Avtar
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
