Petitioner did not press the petition as a compromise was effected between the parties. The matter was dismissed as not pressed.
Petition dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 17260 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 13, 2010
Savita
........Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press
the petition at this stage as compromise has been effected between the parties.
Dismissed as not pressed.
September 13, 2010
(SABINA) JUDGE
Anand
Savita
The State of Haryana and others
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
