Petitioners applied to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition after the state counsel informed the court that a cancellation report was likely to be presented shortly to the competent court.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-16477 of 2010 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-16477 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.7.2010
Jagbir Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Karamjit Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Learned State counsel (on the instructions from Head Constable Sarwan Singh, who is present in court) submits that the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous as a cancellation report has been prepared by the police in the cross version and is likely to be presented before the competent court shortly.
Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
9.7.2010 'rajpal'
Jagbir Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
