In a petition for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a dowry death case, the Court granted bail after noting that relatives of the deceased had absolved the petitioner of responsibility for the death.
Granted bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehabad.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-16290 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 8, 2010
Ashok Kumar
........Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.......Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present: Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Priyanka Dalal, AAG, Haryana.
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.22 dated 27.1.2009, under Sections 304-B/34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad.
It is not disputed that the father and the brother of the deceased has specifically stated that the present petitioner is in no manner responsible for the death and therefore, resiled from the statements.
Bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehabad.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) October 8, 2010 JUDGE Anand
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the withdrawal of implication by relatives of the deceased.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashok Kumar
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
