Petitioners withdrew the present petition pursuant to a prayer made by their counsel. An application regarding the reporting status of the judgment was noted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.15857-M of 2010 Date of Decision:5.10.2010
Teja Singh and others
.... Petitioners
Versus
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Ms. Shivani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for the respondent.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
5.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Teja Singh and others
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
