This court treated the order granting anticipatory bail in FIR No. 03 as absolute because the petitioners had joined the investigation.
Order dated 12.05.2010 granting anticipatory bail is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 13900 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.07.2010
Tej Pal Singh and another
........ Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. R S Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate
for the petitioners
Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State
Ms Sukhpreet Kaur, Advocate for the complainant
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 03 dated 19.05.2009 under Section 457, 380, 448, 427, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station NRI, PS District Kapurthala.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI-Mohinder Singh, states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation.
In view of the above, the order dated 12.05.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
26.07.2010 mohan
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tej Pal Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
