Sakir and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought to withdraw the case, acknowledging false averments and sensitive nature, though court strongly condemned their conduct regarding reporters of local newspapers.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.11651-M of 2010 Date of Decision:26.7.2010
Sakir and others
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Yashwinder Paul Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sakir and others
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Nirmaljit Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/11651/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court